@article {Lakhrouit2020377,
	title = {Analysis and implementation of the impact of change: Application to heterogeneity algorithms in enterprise architecture},
	journal = {International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering},
	volume = {10},
	number = {1},
	year = {2020},
	note = {cited By 0},
	pages = {377-386},
	abstract = {Measurements play an important role in many scientific fields in general and in the analysis of enterprise architecture in particular. In software engineering, the measures are used to control the quality of the software product and better manage development projects to control the cost of production. In this article we proposed firstly models and measures to evaluate and analyze the complexity of the enterprise architecture and especially the heterogeneity of components and relationships, and secondely we developed a model to automatically detect the change of measures and their impact on enterprise architecture. Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.},
	doi = {10.11591/ijece.v10i1.pp377-386},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083115917\&doi=10.11591\%2fijece.v10i1.pp377-386\&partnerID=40\&md5=8b953a41fe9305c536489d454450d483},
	author = {Lakhrouit, J. and Baina, K.}
}
@conference {Ouarhim2020,
	title = {Business Process Modeling Notation Extension for Real Time Handling - Application to Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) management process},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of 2020 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Artificial Intelligence: Technologies and Applications, CloudTech 2020},
	year = {2020},
	note = {cited By 0},
	abstract = {The need of real-time enterprises increases according to our life style and customers{\textquoteright} satisfaction goal. Real-time business process is one of the important components of a real-time enterprise. For that, a formal definition of real-time concept and real-time process was indispensable. This work presents a formal definition of real-time concept, real-time ontology and a proposition of a real-time component with real-time attributes. This new dimension of time contains three components: latency time, acceptance interval and theoretical time. This definition gives a new vision of time, not just an ordinary vision as periods and calendar but as a response to our needs in real-time enterprises: real-time. Before the proposition of a real-time component for BPMN language, which we applicate to Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) management process, as case study. {\textcopyright} 2020 IEEE.},
	keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Business process modeling notations, Cloud computing, Customer satisfaction, Customers{\textquoteright} satisfaction, Formal definition, Management process, Real-time business, Real-time handling, Real-time process, Three component},
	doi = {10.1109/CloudTech49835.2020.9365900},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85102630158\&doi=10.1109\%2fCloudTech49835.2020.9365900\&partnerID=40\&md5=efa760e4fe29ae0509729e730f662b56},
	author = {Ouarhim, A. and Lakhrouit, J. and Baina, K.}
}
@article {Lakhrouit2016535,
	title = {Enterprise architecture complexity component based on archimate language},
	journal = {Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering},
	volume = {366},
	year = {2016},
	note = {cited By 0},
	pages = {535-546},
	abstract = {Enterprise architecture (EA) is a business and IT management tool that has grown in popularity during the last decade. It is based on models of business and IT with systematic frameworks. This paper provides an interesting overview on the agility measurement and dimensions. The proposed approach precises the components of each enterprise architecture layers and the complexity of the future architecture. {\textcopyright} Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016.},
	doi = {10.1007/978-981-287-990-5_43},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84959123655\&doi=10.1007\%2f978-981-287-990-5_43\&partnerID=40\&md5=8e079d797aee4e1a1ebb9b8503ca4c0b},
	author = {Lakhrouit, J. and Baina, K.}
}
@conference {Lakhrouit2016,
	title = {Evaluating enterprise architecture complexity using fuzzy AHP approach: Application to university information system},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA},
	volume = {2016-July},
	year = {2016},
	note = {cited By 0},
	abstract = {Nowadays, enterprise architecture (EA) has garnered considerable attention from both practitioners and academics in the fields of information systems and business management. Enterprise architecture (EA) is an approach to managing the complexity of an organization{\textquoteright}s structures, information technology (IT) and business environment, and facilitating the integration of strategy, personnel, business and IT towards a common goal through the production and use of structural models providing a holistic view of the organization. The aim of this paper is to apply a method already proposed and validated to evaluate enterprise architecture complexity to IGA architecture. {\textcopyright} 2015 IEEE.},
	doi = {10.1109/AICCSA.2015.7507211},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84980315214\&doi=10.1109\%2fAICCSA.2015.7507211\&partnerID=40\&md5=e2ae0691208a20332c677a7d19896ca2},
	author = {Lakhrouit, J. and Baina, K.}
}
@conference {Lakhrouit2015,
	title = {Evaluating complexity of enterprise architecture components landscapes},
	booktitle = {2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications, SITA 2015},
	year = {2015},
	note = {cited By 0},
	abstract = {Evaluation of enterprise architecture complexity enables organisations to assess their current situation. More specifically, it allows optimize the alignment, business strategy, organisational culture, business, people, process and technology. This optimization architecture provides a cost-effective and also helps to ensure the proper execution of objectives and organisational goals. However the whole evaluation of EA regarding its quality and benefits is rather difficult. This paper presents a new method to evaluate the enterprise architecture complexity and facilitating deciding between different TO-BE architecture scenarios. The proposed method is based on the network graph and fuzzy AHP. {\textcopyright} 2015 IEEE.},
	doi = {10.1109/SITA.2015.7358443},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84962448829\&doi=10.1109\%2fSITA.2015.7358443\&partnerID=40\&md5=c3c9ee51d2aff619408b746d324de262},
	author = {Lakhrouit, J. and Baina, K.}
}
@conference {Lakhrouit2015,
	title = {Evaluating enterprise architecture complexity using fuzzy AHP approach},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of 2015 IEEE World Conference on Complex Systems, WCCS 2015},
	year = {2015},
	note = {cited By 0},
	abstract = {Enterprise architecture (EA) is a business and IT management tool that has grown in popularity during the last decade. The scope of the enterprise architecture includes the people, processes, information and technology of the enterprise, and their relationships to one another and to the external environment. The aim of this paper is to provide a method quantifying the heterogeneity of enterprise architecture components and facilitating deciding between different TO-BE architecture scenarios. {\textcopyright} 2015 IEEE.},
	doi = {10.1109/ICoCS.2015.7483316},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84978429590\&doi=10.1109\%2fICoCS.2015.7483316\&partnerID=40\&md5=23f008e881d7882aa4561d0e1cd2a22c},
	author = {Lakhrouit, J. and Baina, K.}
}
@conference {Lakhrouit2014309,
	title = {A model for enterprise architecture evaluation},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 7th IADIS International Conference Information Systems 2014, IS 2014},
	year = {2014},
	note = {cited By 0},
	pages = {309-313},
	abstract = {Nowadays, enterprise architecture (EA) has become an intensively discussed approach in both industry and academia for managing the complexity of an enterprise from a holistic perspective, because it optimizes the alignment, the business strategy, the organization, the resources, the processes and the technology. Among the steps to develop complete enterprise architecture we find the evaluation. EA evaluation help to understand to what degree the EA goals of an organization are achieved. However it is very difficult to find a complete method of evaluation in term of indicators of evaluation and which ensures the follow-up of all the stages of development of the architecture of company. This article presents a generic model of evaluation enterprise architecture. We do not want to use attributes directly because the model definition could vary in different organizations. Therefore, we introduce this artifact as an intermediate layer as not to limit the flexibility of evaluations. {\textcopyright} 2014 IADIS.},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84944097109\&partnerID=40\&md5=85e71eeb94aa002ea03c1988f4716b6b},
	author = {Lakhrouit, J. and Baina, K.}
}
@conference {Lakhrouit2013,
	title = {State of the art of the maturity models to an evaluation of the enterprise architecture},
	booktitle = {2013 3rd International Symposium ISKO-Maghreb},
	year = {2013},
	note = {cited By 1},
	abstract = {The evaluation of enterprise Architecture EA allows companies to evaluate their current situation. More specifically, it optimizes the alignment, the business strategy, the organization, the resources, the processes and the technology. This optimized architecture provides a cost-efficient solution and also contributes to ensure the successful implementation of the purposes of the organization. However it is very difficult to find a complete method of evaluation in term of indicators of evaluation and which ensures the follow-up of all the stages of development of the architecture of company. This article presents the possibility of evaluation starting from the methods of maturity of existing enterprise architecture. {\textcopyright} 2013 IEEE.},
	doi = {10.1109/ISKO-Maghreb.2013.6728119},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84894142416\&doi=10.1109\%2fISKO-Maghreb.2013.6728119\&partnerID=40\&md5=3d7d580b1e6392067ca7ce4f1ab99530},
	author = {Lakhrouit, J. and Baina, K.}
}
