@conference {Chaouni2016,
	title = {A Rules-based system for model composition},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA},
	volume = {2016-July},
	year = {2016},
	note = {cited By 0},
	abstract = {Model composition is one of the challenges of software systems modeling. As models are usually created independently, they present many types of heterogeneity (syntactic, semantic, local structural and global structural). These heterogeneities cause conflicts when composing models, and may introduce problems and inconsistencies in the resulting model. Indeed, when composing models, to consider that two elements are different when they are equivalent will introduce redundancy. Worst, considering two elements as equivalent when they are different will result in information lost. The purpose of this work is to present an approach of model composition for dealing with conflicts. Our hybrid approach integrates thus all aspects: semantic, syntactic, local structural and global structural in order to detect the right equivalences and right differences. We use ontologies to treat the semantic aspect of the model comparison. We propose a rule-based system called Co-Models. These rules are proposed formally. Finally, our approach is implemented and validated through a use case from banking domain. {\textcopyright} 2015 IEEE.},
	doi = {10.1109/AICCSA.2015.7507217},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84980319574\&doi=10.1109\%2fAICCSA.2015.7507217\&partnerID=40\&md5=2884b5ed453e53a7d4c05f5aaac0781c},
	author = {Chaouni, S.B.a and Fredj, M.b and Mouline, S.c}
}
@conference {Oufkir2013,
	title = {Linking knowledge management valuation to intellectual capital: A conceptual study},
	booktitle = {2013 3rd International Symposium ISKO-Maghreb},
	year = {2013},
	note = {cited By 0},
	abstract = {Knowledge management (KM) and intellectual capital (IC) are two big research questions in nowadays management topics. In fact, the relation between these two subjects varies from analogy to complementarity. Defining these concepts remains for long years a controversy, because both topics imply different disciplines. And despite the multidisciplinary of the field, it is agreed that KM treats both knowledge as an object, and management as a set of tools and techniques. The association between these two aspects is the essence of KM. Whereas with the IC, the focus is much on the effect and value generated by the intellectual asset, which implies a notion of valuation and measurement. The relationship between concepts of IC and KM needs to be redefined in view of field progress. In our paper, we assume that {\textquoteright}IC is suited to KM valuation and performance measurement{\textquoteright}: a conceptual review of the literature within this work should give foundation to this hypothesis. Further foreseen analytical verification may empower it to be a basic rule on the design of future KM valuation indicators. {\textcopyright} 2013 IEEE.},
	doi = {10.1109/ISKO-Maghreb.2013.6728169},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84894168406\&doi=10.1109\%2fISKO-Maghreb.2013.6728169\&partnerID=40\&md5=3992beae3e503b5072db3383bfbbc6e8},
	author = {Oufkir, L.a and Fredj, M.b and Kassou, I.b}
}
