@conference {Chabibi2016148,
	title = {Integrating SysML with simulation environments (Simulink) by model transformation approach},
	booktitle = {Proceedings - 25th IEEE International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, WETICE 2016},
	year = {2016},
	note = {cited By 0},
	pages = {148-150},
	abstract = {In system-level design, descriptive system models seem to be insufficient in order to perform a system verification which fulfils various stakeholders0 requirements. This fact is accentuated by the increasing complexity of system engineering projects and, as a consequence, the difficulties to deal with both their coordination and trace ability. Even if SysML (System Modeling Language) is considered as a flexible and standard tool for system engineering, using only descriptive models are insufficient for system behavior verifications. To deal with this concern, simulation environments (i.e. MATLAB/Simulink) allow verifying if the system preliminary design satisfies requirements or not. As a consequence, various research works have been centered on combining the potential of both SysML modeling and simulation tools. This paper proposes an integration approach based on metamodeling and model transformations to generate Simulink models from SysML diagrams. This approach is handled by models and modern techniques of MDE (Model-Driven Engineering). {\textcopyright} 2016 IEEE.},
	doi = {10.1109/WETICE.2016.39},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84983801501\&doi=10.1109\%2fWETICE.2016.39\&partnerID=40\&md5=52ebc18a65b73155173099045a8b3ee2},
	author = {Chabibi, B.a and Douche, A.b and Anwar, A.b and Nassar, M.a}
}
@conference {Chabibi2016,
	title = {Towards an alignment of SysML and simulation tools},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA},
	volume = {2016-July},
	year = {2016},
	note = {cited By 1},
	abstract = {Even if it is considered as an effective language for system modeling because of the descriptive aspect of its diagrams, SysML (System Modeling Language) is insufficient for verification of their behavior. This lack is accentuated by the increasing complexity of recent systems. In order to conduct behavior verifications, designers use simulation tools to realize experiments on the studied system. Thus, the efficiency of the engineering process is often reduced because of the separate and consecutive use of both SysML modeling and simulation tools. As a consequence, various research works focused on unifying the potential provided by the SysML language and simulation environments. We propose in this paper to study links taxonomy between SysML and various existing simulation environments. The ultimate goal of this study is to consider the most optimal passage from SysML to various simulation tools. A common environment based on models and modern techniques of model-based engineering will handle this transformation. {\textcopyright} 2015 IEEE.},
	doi = {10.1109/AICCSA.2015.7507216},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84980349948\&doi=10.1109\%2fAICCSA.2015.7507216\&partnerID=40\&md5=963c125b0daeba5c1d58c329f95e4ef1},
	author = {Chabibi, B.a and Anwar, A.b and Nassar, M.a}
}
