@article {Boukhayma2018882, title = {Assessing decision support systems success: A conceptual analysis}, journal = {International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology}, volume = {9}, number = {13}, year = {2018}, pages = {882-889}, url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059574985\&partnerID=40\&md5=777c381eb0e1c33a719dc4dfa846e39f}, author = {Boukhayma, K. and Elmanouar, A.} } @article {Boukhayma2018800, title = {Evaluating decision support systems{\textquoteright} effect on user learning: An exploratory study}, journal = {Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing}, volume = {746}, year = {2018}, pages = {800-809}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_75}, url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85045293403\&doi=10.1007\%2f978-3-319-77712-2_75\&partnerID=40\&md5=0f719cc177883091f3b6b25541ed92ae}, author = {Boukhayma, K. and Elmanouar, A.} } @conference {Boukhayma2016404, title = {Evaluating decision support systems}, booktitle = {International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, ISDA}, volume = {2016-June}, year = {2016}, note = {cited By 0}, pages = {404-408}, abstract = {Decision support systems is a well-established research topic. In the pursuit of successful decision support systems implementation, research has been actively carried to identify Evaluation methods. This paper reviews Decision support systems with a focus on evaluation. The literature review presents a comparative study of different frameworks and approaches to perform the evaluation process: Multifaceted, Sequential and General. By the mean of examples, we summarize a set of newer methods proposed to overcome the limitations of these approaches and we identify areas that need to be addressed in the future. {\textcopyright} 2015 IEEE.}, doi = {10.1109/ISDA.2015.7489263}, url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84978419511\&doi=10.1109\%2fISDA.2015.7489263\&partnerID=40\&md5=6cb593c5d0bcec4780caac8a099f942f}, author = {Boukhayma, K. and Elmanouar, A.} }