@article {CHLIOUI20211039,
	title = {Ensemble case based reasoning imputation in breast cancer classification},
	journal = {Journal of Information Science and Engineering},
	volume = {37},
	number = {5},
	year = {2021},
	note = {cited By 1},
	pages = {1039-1051},
	abstract = {Missing Data (MD) is a common drawback that affects breast cancer classification. Thus, handling missing data is primordial before building any breast cancer classifier. This paper presents the impact of using ensemble Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) imputation on breast cancer classification. Thereafter, we evaluated the influence of CBR using parameter tuning and ensemble CBR (E-CBR) with three missingness mechanisms (MCAR: Missing completely at random, MAR: Missing at random and NMAR: not missing at random) and nine percentages (10\% to 90\%) on the accuracy rates of five classifiers: Decision trees, Random forest, K-nearest neighbor, Support vector machine and Multi-layer perceptron over two Wisconsin breast cancer datasets. All experiments were implemented using Weka JAVA API code 3.8; SPSS v20 was used for statistical tests. The findings confirmed that E-CBR yields to better results compared to CBR for the five classifiers. The MD percentage affects negatively the classifier performance: As the MD percentage increases, the accuracy rates of the classifier decrease regardless the MD mechanism and technique. RF with E-CBR outperformed all the other combinations (MD technique, classifier) with 89.72\% for MCAR, 87.08\% for MAR and 86.84\% for NMAR. {\textcopyright} 2021 Institute of Information Science. All rights reserved.},
	keywords = {Accuracy rate, Breast Cancer, Breast cancer classifications, Cancer classifier, Case based reasoning, Case-based reasoning imputation, Casebased reasonings (CBR), Classification (of information), Data handling, Decision trees, Diseases, Ensemble, Missing at randoms, Missing data, Nearest neighbor search, Parameters tuning, Support vector machines},
	doi = {10.6688/JISE.202109_37(5).0004},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85115966179\&doi=10.6688\%2fJISE.202109_37\%285\%29.0004\&partnerID=40\&md5=97c15046a8900f9df38ec3430801c844},
	author = {Chlioui, I. and Idri, A. and Abnane, I. and EZZAT, M.}
}
@article {Chlioui202061,
	title = {Comparing Statistical and Machine Learning Imputation Techniques in Breast Cancer Classification},
	journal = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)},
	volume = {12252 LNCS},
	year = {2020},
	note = {cited By 1},
	pages = {61-76},
	abstract = {Missing data imputation is an important task when dealing with crucial data that cannot be discarded such as medical data. This study evaluates and compares the impacts of two statistical and two machine learning imputation techniques when classifying breast cancer patients, using several evaluation metrics. Mean, Expectation-Maximization (EM), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) were applied to impute 18\% of missing data missed completely at random in the two Wisconsin datasets. Thereafter, we empirically evaluated these four imputation techniques when using five classifiers: decision tree (C4.5), Case Based Reasoning (CBR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). In total, 1380 experiments were conducted and the findings confirmed that classification using imputation based machine learning outperformed classification using statistical imputation. Moreover, our experiment showed that SVR was the best imputation method for breast cancer classification. {\textcopyright} 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.},
	keywords = {Breast cancer classifications, Case based reasoning, Casebased reasonings (CBR), Decision trees, Diseases, Expectation Maximization, Imputation techniques, K nearest neighbor (KNN), Learning systems, Maximum principle, Missing data imputations, Multi layer perceptron, Multilayer neural networks, Nearest neighbor search, Support vector machines, Support vector regression, Support vector regression (SVR)},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-58811-3_5},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85092259110\&doi=10.1007\%2f978-3-030-58811-3_5\&partnerID=40\&md5=fd5730e8014d40306df07238106d32ff},
	author = {Chlioui, I. and Abnane, I. and Idri, A.}
}
@article {Chlioui2020547,
	title = {Data preprocessing in knowledge discovery in breast cancer: systematic mapping study},
	journal = {Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization},
	volume = {8},
	number = {5},
	year = {2020},
	note = {cited By 5},
	pages = {547-561},
	abstract = {Data Mining (DM) is a set of techniques that allow to analyse data from different perspectives and summarising it into useful information. Data mining has been increasingly used in medicine, especially in oncology. Data preprocessing is the most important step of knowledge extraction process and allows to improve the performance of the DM models. Breast cancer (BC) becomes the most common cancer among females worldwide and the leading cause of women{\textquoteright}s death. This paper aims to perform a systematic mapping study to analyse and synthesise studies on the application of preprocessing techniques for a DM task in breast cancer.Therefore, 66 relevant articles published between 2000 and October 2018 were selected and analysed according to five criteria: year/channel of publication, research type, medical task, empirical type and preprocessing task. The results show that Conferences and journals are the most targeted publication sources, researchers were more interested in applying preprocessing techniques for the diagnosis of BC, historical-based evaluation was the most used empirical type in the evaluation of preprocessing techniques in BC, and data reduction was the most investigated task of preprocessing in BC. However, A low number of papers discussed treatment which encourages researchers to devote more efforts to this task. {\textcopyright} 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \& Francis Group.},
	keywords = {algorithm, Article, Breast Cancer, cancer classification, cancer prognosis, clinical assessment, clinical outcome, Data mining, Data mining models, Data mining tasks, Data preprocessing, Diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, Diseases, Extraction process, health promotion, human, image analysis, knowledge, knowledge discovery, Knowledge extraction, Machine learning, Mapping, Medical informatics, nerve cell network, neural crest cell, Performance, Pre-processing techniques, processing, screening test, Systematic mapping studies, Systematic Review, validity},
	doi = {10.1080/21681163.2020.1730974},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85080112312\&doi=10.1080\%2f21681163.2020.1730974\&partnerID=40\&md5=befb1bc3f31f676a8e95bbc5bff5ab6d},
	author = {Chlioui, I. and Idri, A. and Abnane, I.}
}
@conference {Idri2018,
	title = {A systematic map of data analytics in breast cancer},
	booktitle = {ACM International Conference Proceeding Series},
	year = {2018},
	doi = {10.1145/3167918.3167930},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044739616\&doi=10.1145\%2f3167918.3167930\&partnerID=40\&md5=4cfbf5c917bfa294988a996c72ff2234},
	author = {Idri, A. and Chlioui, I. and El Ouassif, B.}
}
