@article {CruzZapata2014,
	title = {Mobile PHRs compliance with android and ios usability guidelines mobile systems},
	journal = {Journal of Medical Systems},
	volume = {38},
	number = {8},
	year = {2014},
	note = {cited By 15},
	abstract = {Mobile Personal Health Records (PHRs) have achieved a particularly strong market share since the appearance of more powerful mobile devices and popular worldwide mobile application markets such as Apple{\textquoteright}s App Store and Android{\textquoteright}s Google Play. However, Android and Apple have a set of recommendations on design and usability targeted towards developers who wish to publish apps in their stores: Android Design Guidelines and iOS Human Interface Guidelines. This paper aims to evaluate compliance with these guidelines by assessing the usability recommendations of a set of 24 selected mobile PHR applications. An analysis process based on a well-known Systematic Literature Review (SLR) protocol was used. The results show that the 24 mobile PHR applications studied are not suitably structured. 46 \% of these applications do not use any of the recommended patterns, using instead lists or springboards, which are deprecated patterns for top-level menus. 70 \% of the PHRs require a registration to be able to test the application when these interactions should be delayed. Our study will help both PHR users to select user-friendly mobile PHRs and PHR providers and developers to identify the good usability practices implemented by the applications with the highest scores. {\textcopyright} 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York.},
	doi = {10.1007/s10916-014-0081-6},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84904039765\&doi=10.1007\%2fs10916-014-0081-6\&partnerID=40\&md5=6c10e4e66d8521cf01c2571845e3920c},
	author = {Cruz Zapata, B.a and Hern{\'a}ndez Ni{\~n}irola, A.a and Idri, A.b and Fern{\'a}ndez-Alem{\'a}n, J.L.a and Toval, A.a}
}
