Classification techniques in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic literature review

TitreClassification techniques in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic literature review
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsElOuassif, B, Idri, A, Hosni, M, Abran, A
JournalComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization
Volume9
Pagination50-77
Mots-clésArticle, Artificial intelligence, artificial neural network, Breast Cancer, Breast cancer diagnosis, cancer diagnosis, cause of death, Causes of death, Classification (of information), Classification technique, Comparison of performance, Computer aided diagnosis, data extraction, Data mining, data synthesis, decision tree, Decision trees, Diseases, human, k nearest neighbor, Machine learning, Medical fields, Medical informatics, Network support, Neural networks, publication, qualitative research, Quality control, support vector machine, Support vector machine classifiers, Support vector machines, Support vectors machine, Systematic literature review, Systematic Review, validity
Abstract

Data mining (DM) consists in analysing a set of observations to find unsuspected relationships and then summarising the data in new ways that are both understandable and useful. It has become widely used in various medical fields including breast cancer (BC), which is the most common cancer and the leading cause of death among women worldwide. BC diagnosis is a challenging medical task and many studies have attempted to apply classification techniques to it. The objective of the present study is to identify studies on classification techniques in BC diagnosis and to analyse them from three perspectives: classification techniques used, accuracy of the classifiers, and comparison of performance. We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) of 176 selected studies published between January 2000 and November 2018. The results show that, of the nine classification techniques investigated, artificial neural networks, support vector machines and decision trees were the most frequently used. Moreover, artificial neural networks, support vector machines and ensemble classifiers performed better than the other techniques, with median accuracy values of 95%, 95% and 96% respectively. Most of the selected studies (57.4%) used datasets containing different types of images such as mammographic, ultrasound, and microarray images. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85098842973&doi=10.1080%2f21681163.2020.1811159&partnerID=40&md5=9a48998b1c44d263863efcfb25f9920f
DOI10.1080/21681163.2020.1811159
Revues: 

Partenaires

Localisation

Suivez-nous sur

         

    

Contactez-nous

ENSIAS

Avenue Mohammed Ben Abdallah Regragui, Madinat Al Irfane, BP 713, Agdal Rabat, Maroc

  Télécopie : (+212) 5 37 68 60 78

  Secrétariat de direction : 06 61 48 10 97

        Secrétariat général : 06 61 34 09 27

        Service des affaires financières : 06 61 44 76 79

        Service des affaires estudiantines : 06 62 77 10 17 / n.mhirich@um5s.net.ma

        CEDOC ST2I : 06 66 39 75 16

        Résidences : 06 61 82 89 77

Contacts

    

    Compteur de visiteurs:634,781
    Education - This is a contributing Drupal Theme
    Design by WeebPal.