Evaluating a Comparing Deep Learning Architectures for Blood Glucose Prediction

TitreEvaluating a Comparing Deep Learning Architectures for Blood Glucose Prediction
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsT. Idrissi, E, Idri, A
JournalCommunications in Computer and Information Science
Volume1400 CCIS
Pagination347-365
Mots-clésBiomedical engineering, Blood, Blood glucose level, Comparative studies, Continuous glucosemonitoring (CGM), Convolutional neural networks, Deep learning, Diabetic patient, Disease control, Forecasting, Glucose, Learning architectures, Learning techniques, Long short-term memory, Mean square error, Parameters selection, Root mean square errors
Abstract

To manage their disease, diabetic patients need to control the blood glucose level (BGL) by monitoring it and predicting its future values. This allows to avoid high or low BGL by taking recommended actions in advance. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study of two emerging deep learning techniques: Long-Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for one-step and multi-steps-ahead forecasting of the BGL based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) data. The objectives are twofold: 1) Determining the best strategies of multi-steps-ahead forecasting (MSF) to fit the CNN and LSTM models respectively, and 2) Comparing the performances of the CNN and LSTM models for one-step and multi-steps prediction. Toward these objectives, we firstly conducted series of experiments of a CNN model through parameters selection to determine its best configuration. The LSTM model we used in the present study was developed and evaluated in an earlier work. Thereafter, five MSF strategies were developed and evaluated for the CNN and LSTM models using the Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) with an horizon of 30 min. To statistically assess the differences between the performances of CNN and LSTM models, we used the Wilcoxon statistical test. The results showed that: 1) no MSF strategy outperformed the others for both CNN and LSTM models, and 2) the proposed CNN model significantly outperformed the LSTM model for both one-step and multi-steps prediction. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85107268637&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-72379-8_17&partnerID=40&md5=2b36d3e75ce8d317c8b80f3272f4d956
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-72379-8_17
Revues: 

Partenaires

Localisation

Suivez-nous sur

         

    

Contactez-nous

ENSIAS

Avenue Mohammed Ben Abdallah Regragui, Madinat Al Irfane, BP 713, Agdal Rabat, Maroc

  Télécopie : (+212) 5 37 68 60 78

  Secrétariat de direction : 06 61 48 10 97

        Secrétariat général : 06 61 34 09 27

        Service des affaires financières : 06 61 44 76 79

        Service des affaires estudiantines : 06 62 77 10 17 / n.mhirich@um5s.net.ma

        Résidences : 06 61 82 89 77

Contacts

    

Education - This is a contributing Drupal Theme
Design by WeebPal.