Investigating Accuracy and Diversity in Heterogeneous Ensembles for Breast Cancer Classification

TitreInvestigating Accuracy and Diversity in Heterogeneous Ensembles for Breast Cancer Classification
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsB. Ouassif, E, Idri, A, Hosni, M
JournalLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume12950 LNCS
Pagination263-281
Mots-clésBreast Cancer, Combining classifiers, Computer aided diagnosis, Diseases, Diversity measure, Ensemble members, Ensemble-classifier, Heterogeneous ensembles, Member selection, Performance, Selection based, Voting, Voting machines
Abstract

Breast Cancer (BC) is one of the most common forms of cancer among women. Detecting and accurately diagnosing breast cancer at an early phase increase the chances of women’s survival. For this purpose, various single classification techniques have been investigated to diagnosis BC. Nevertheless, none of them proved to be accurate in all circumstances. Recently, a promising approach called ensemble classifiers have been widely used to assist physicians accurately diagnose BC. Ensemble classifiers consist on combining a set of single classifiers by means of an aggregation layer. The literature in general shows that ensemble techniques outperformed single ones when ensemble members are accurate (i.e. have the lowest percentage error) and diverse (i.e. the single classifiers make uncorrelated errors on new instances). Hence, selecting ensemble members is often a crucial task since it can lead to the opposite: single techniques outperformed their ensemble. This paper evaluates and compares ensemble members’ selection based on accuracy and diversity with ensemble members’ selection based on accuracy only. A comparison with ensembles without member selection was also performed. Ensemble performance was assessed in terms of accuracy, F1-score. Q statistics diversity measure was used to calculate the classifiers diversity. The experiments were carried out on three well-known BC datasets available from online repositories. Seven single classifiers were used in our experiments. Skott Knott test and Borda Count voting system were used to assess the significance of the performance differences and rank ensembles according to theirs performances. The findings of this study suggest that: (1) Investigating both accuracy and diversity to select ensemble members often led to better performance, and (2) In general, selecting ensemble members using accuracy and/or diversity led to better ensemble performance than constructing ensembles without members’ selection. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125278232&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-86960-1_19&partnerID=40&md5=58285ac3fe1b29564700bef136a94771
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-86960-1_19
Revues: 

Partenaires

Localisation

Suivez-nous sur

         

    

Contactez-nous

ENSIAS

Avenue Mohammed Ben Abdallah Regragui, Madinat Al Irfane, BP 713, Agdal Rabat, Maroc

  Télécopie : (+212) 5 37 68 60 78

  Secrétariat de direction : 06 61 48 10 97

        Secrétariat général : 06 61 34 09 27

        Service des affaires financières : 06 61 44 76 79

        Service des affaires estudiantines : 06 62 77 10 17 / n.mhirich@um5s.net.ma

        CEDOC ST2I : 06 66 39 75 16

        Résidences : 06 61 82 89 77

Contacts

    

    Compteur de visiteurs:640,540
    Education - This is a contributing Drupal Theme
    Design by WeebPal.