Strategies of multi-step-ahead forecasting for blood glucose level using LSTM neural networks: A comparative study

TitreStrategies of multi-step-ahead forecasting for blood glucose level using LSTM neural networks: A comparative study
Publication TypeConference Paper
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsT. Idrissi, E, Idri, A, Kadi, I, Bakkoury, Z
Conference NameHEALTHINF 2020 - 13th International Conference on Health Informatics, Proceedings; Part of 13th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, BIOSTEC 2020
Mots-clésBiomedical engineering, Blood, Blood glucose level, Comparative studies, Continuous glucosemonitoring (CGM), Forecasting, Glucose, Long short-term memory, Mean absolute error, Mean square error, Medical informatics, MIMO systems, Multi-step-ahead predictions, Neural network model, Performance criterion, Root mean square errors
Abstract

Predicting the blood glucose level (BGL) is crucial for self-management of Diabetes. In general, a BGL prediction is done based on the previous measurements of BGL, which can be taken either (manually) by using sticks or (automatically) by using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices. To allow the diabetic patients to take appropriate actions, the BGL predictions should be done ahead of time; thus a multi-step ahead prediction is suitable. Therefore, many Multi-Step-ahead Forecasting (MSF) strategies have been developed and evaluated, and can be categorized in five types: Recursive, Direct, MIMO (for Multiple Input Multiple Output), DirMO (combining Direct and MIMO) and DirRec (combining Direct and Recursive). However, none of them is known to be the best strategy in all contexts. The present study aims at: 1) reviewing the MSF strategies, and 2) determining the best strategy to fit with a LSTM Neural Network model. Hence, we evaluated and compared in terms of two performance criteria: Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), the five MSF strategies using a LSTM Neural Network with an horizon of 30 minutes. The results show that there is no strategy that significantly outperformed others when using the Wilcoxon statistical test. However, when using the Sum Ranking Differences method, MIMO is the best strategy for both RMSE and MAE criteria. © 2020 by SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved.

URLhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083722214&partnerID=40&md5=bd9e45a8538559492b02432e5567d10e
Revues: 

Partenaires

Localisation

Suivez-nous sur

         

    

Contactez-nous

ENSIAS

Avenue Mohammed Ben Abdallah Regragui, Madinat Al Irfane, BP 713, Agdal Rabat, Maroc

  Télécopie : (+212) 5 37 68 60 78

  Secrétariat de direction : 06 61 48 10 97

        Secrétariat général : 06 61 34 09 27

        Service des affaires financières : 06 61 44 76 79

        Service des affaires estudiantines : 06 62 77 10 17 / n.mhirich@um5s.net.ma

        CEDOC ST2I : 06 66 39 75 16

        Résidences : 06 61 82 89 77

Contacts

    

    Compteur de visiteurs:640,923
    Education - This is a contributing Drupal Theme
    Design by WeebPal.